Common belief is that mass media is a giant social
influencer. It can manipulate what the audience believes of the world through
its words and propaganda. However, Lazarsfeld does not seem to believe so. He
says that mass media simply “operate[s] toward the maintenance of the going
social and cultural structure rather than toward its change” (234). This
article brought out a new perspective on mass media that I never saw. Mass
media always struck me as a means for these social influencers to advocate for
social change, and to affirm or even alter the way the audience thinks about
certain issues and current events. Yet Lazarsfeld claims that mass media pushes
for no social change and simply affirms what already exists, it basically
reflects reality back to the audience. This may be true in certain media such
as television shows and other purely entertainment-focused content. Yet I would
argue otherwise for media such as news broadcasting or the rising social media
networks.
Voice of America is the U.S. federally owned broadcasting
organization. Since it is federally owned and it’s a broadcasting organization,
I’m sure you can guess what the intentions are behind this structure—to spread
American ideology to the rest of the world. It wittily puts on the facade of
trying to educate other countries, especially ones with communist or socialist
structures, new ideologies and thoughts that are usually not spread or
encouraged within that nation. However at its inner core, the intentions are to
spread American ideology and democratic philosophies in order to instill American
dominance on the rest of the world. By broadcasting information, Voice of
America may not be able to directly cause social change, but the act of spreading
that news is the first step in creating that change. The broadcasting agency is
able to spark social action if not carry it out completely. Moreover, the rise
of social networking media in recent years has brought about significant change
to the way society interacts. Facebook has become the dominant means through
which friends communicate other than phone or email. Networks such as LinkedIn
has made visible the power of connections in the professional field and has become
a tool for many to develop their careers more easily than before. I don't completely agree with Lazarsfeld that mass media merely affirms the status quo and
does nothing to cause social change. In many ways, mass media is the first step
to social change, and the largest driver of action if not the implementer of action
itself.
Did you know that Lazarsfeld was actually involved in the research activities of Voice of America in its early years? The field of mass communications arose with these mid-century radio studies (for a useful overview of Lazarsfeld's work and his collaborations with other scholars, like Merton, see this bio.)
ReplyDeleteTo address your primary argument, I doubt L&M would have said mass media do "nothing" to drive social change; rather, most of the time, for most people, it provides more affirmation or confirmation than challenge. Of course, if one seeks out divergent opinion with an open mind, that's another story, but how often do we do that on a daily basis?